New Beginnings

Research, Scholarship and News

With impact in everything from constitutional law and privacy rights to campaign finance reform and the environment, members of the Stanford Law School community shape law and policy through leading-edge research.

more

COP26: Promise and Limits of Vows to Rein in Methane and Protect Forests

Shadowboxing in Sacramento: Potential Wildfire Legislation—and the Evidence Legislators Should See First

As wildfires have continued to rage in California, lawmakers have repeatedly offered proposals to contain their cost. One proposal, though, has consumer groups, victims’ rights organizations, the NAACP, and even the insurance industry sounding the alarm, even though no formal legislation has been introduced.

SLS Degree Programs

Stanford Law Students Share Their Stories

read more

Unique Opportunities at SLS

2026 LLM x Law Hackathon

The hackathon wasn’t just a competition; it was a glimpse into what becomes possible when the people who understand AI and the people who understand law are finally in the same room, building together.

Connect with Us

Should courts use artificial intelligence? Daniel Ho, the William Benjamin Scott and Luna M. Scott Professor of Law and Director of RegLab, and Olivia Martin, JD/PhD candidate, RegLab Law Student Fellow and Knight-Hennessy Scholar, tackled this question at the D.C. Circuit Judicial Conference with ...striking findings.

Their research shows frontier AI models can analyze thousands of regulatory comments in minutes and conduct comprehensive statutory surveys—tasks that traditionally take days. But these same models exhibit critical flaws, including hallucinations and accepting fabricated legal premises.

The stakes: Without hands-on experience, courts risk falling behind litigants already using these tools—creating a dangerous information asymmetry in the courtroom.

Read their full analysis: https://brnw.ch/21x5k7l

Research from the Deborah L. Rhode Center on the Legal Profession gets a close look in the most recent New York Times Docket newsletter.

The study asks: If court records are presumptively public, why are so many federal civil filings sealed? The answer points to a system in which sealing ...requests are often uncontested, leaving judges as the public’s principal safeguard.

As study co-author Professor Nora Freeman Engstrom told the NYT’s Adam Liptak, there are legitimate reasons for secrecy and real trade-offs. But judges need to do more than simply rubber-stamp requests to seal materials that shape their decisions.

Read more in the NYT (subscription may be required): https://brnw.ch/21x5hM3

Read the Rhode Center’s policy brief: https://brnw.ch/21x5hM4

Stanford Law School research is at the center of a new Atlantic article examining what happens to political spending after fatal school shootings.

The study finds that pro-gun PACs sharply increase contributions to favored House candidates in competitive districts after children are killed... in school shootings. Eric Baldwin, Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Stanford Law School, led the study, along with co-authors John J. Donohue III, the C. Wendell and Edith M. Carlsmith Professor of Law, and Takuma Iwasaki, a Stanford Law JSD candidate.

“The data shows that the gun lobby saves its political firepower for the moments when public grief is greatest and lawmakers are under the most pressure to act,” Baldwin tells The Atlantic.

“School Shootings and the Strategic Contributions of Gun Policy PACs in U.S. House Elections” was published earlier this year in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Read it here: https://brnw.ch/21x5g5h

Read more in The Atlantic (subscription may be required): https://brnw.ch/21x5g5i