
Feb 9, 2010 kdansky: RT @nminsker: Bad policies are what's really drivin...
Feb 3, 2010 kdansky: SCJC blog: Child Pornography and an Issue of Restit...
Feb 3, 2010 Child Pornography, and an Issue of Restitution...
Feb 3, 2010 kdansky: RT @ACSLaw: Suit by child porn victim raises novel ...
Feb 3, 2010 kdansky: Crime Report: Crime rates continue to fall while in...
Feb 3, 2010 kdansky: DHHS study shows "unprecedented" and &quo...
Feb 1, 2010 kdansky: Majority of LA homicide victims are Latino; most ho...
Feb 1, 2010 kdansky: NPR's "Budget Analysis by Issue: Justice"...
Feb 1, 2010 kdansky: Stanford Law School: Panel discussion on race and i...
Jan 26, 2010 kdansky: SCJC blog: Three Years, 2603 Killings (from LA Time...
Jan 26, 2010 Three years, 2603 killings...
Jan 20, 2010 The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblin...
Jan 18, 2010 Governor’s Plan for Prisons Ignores Racial History...
Publication Date: January 27, 2010
Source: KCRW News
Professor Joan Petersilia, an expert in parole reform and prisoner reintegration, talks to Warren Olney of KCRW about reforming the California prison system:
California's under a federal court order to give prisoners more humane treatment and the state's trying to save money. What will reducing the prison population mean for crime on the streets? We talk with the Secretary of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others. On our rebroadcast of today's To the Point, just one year ago, Democrats were talking about a new political era. Now, President Obama faces a nation of angry voters. We'll set the scene for his first address on the State of the Nation.
Banner image: Secretary Cate of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation responds to the three-judge panel's 40,000 inmate release order
...
Reforming the California Prison System
A three-judge federal panel has found that California’s prisons are overcrowded to the point where inmates die almost on a daily basis. It’s ordered that prison populations be reduced. At the same time, a new state law has reformed the parole system. So-called "low risk" parolees won’t be supervised so intensely, which means they won’t be sent back to prison so often. The program started yesterday, and state officials insist that is not what some are calling "early release."
Guests:
Matthew Cate: Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Justin Eisenberg: Captain, Los Angeles Police Department
Joan Petersilia: Chair, Governor Schwarzenegger’s Rehabilitation Strike Team
More News from Stanford Criminal Justice Center (SCJC)The Stanford Criminal Justice Center (SCJC) serves as Stanford's vehicle for promoting and coordinating the study of criminal law and the criminal justice system, including legal and interdisciplinary research, policy analysis, curriculum development, and preparation of law students for careers in criminal law. The center is headed by faculty co-directors Robert Weisberg and Joan Petersilia and executive director Kara Dansky.
SCJC's areas of interest include criminal trial practice and procedure, institutional examination of the police and correctional systems, social science study of the origins of criminal behavior and methods of punishment, and criminal legislation and enforcement in areas ranging from drug crimes to federal white collar crimes.
One major goal of the center is to encourage collaborative criminal justice policy development at the national, state, regional, and local levels by: promoting public/private partnerships between different levels of government in the criminal justice arena; creating opportunities for the use of social science research to aid in the development and implementation of empirically-validated, data-driven criminal justice programs and policies; and serving as a public service consultant to public officials at all levels of government.
The center brings legal scholars together with social science experts, government officials, nonprofit leaders, and criminal justice practitioners in the form of conferences, academic symposia, policy forums and strategic roundtables addressing pragmatic issues of criminal justice reform.
Collaboration within the law school's faculty helps promote multi-student empirical research projects and co-authorship with professors. Reaching beyond SLS, law faculty and students in the program work with other units at Stanford whose work bears on criminal justice issues, including the Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity (CCSRE) and the Institute for Research in the Social Sciences (IRiSS).
SCJC works closely with the law students’ Criminal Law Society to present the Stanford Criminal Law and Justice Speaker Series – a series of quarterly presentations by eminent academics and practitioners in criminal law and criminal justice.
In alliance with the Clinical Education Program and Public Interest Program at Stanford Law School, SCJC supervises and places students in outstanding externships in prosecution and defense agencies, advises students on a range of criminal law career opportunities, and provides students with the resources they need to move successfully into careers in the fields of criminal law and criminal justice policy.
The Stanford Criminal Justice Center is frequently asked to provide legal analysis for various government and non-profit entities on a broad range of topics related to criminal law and criminal justice policy. Our goal in this endeavor is to offer the best possible legal analysis of the subjects we're asked to comment on, and to remain neutral regarding any related political issues. Please feel free to review some of the reports that we've developed here.
The Stanford Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections is an innovative form of policy working group designed to bring together the key public, academic, and organizational leaders in the field of criminal justice policy in a spirit of cooperative movement toward reform of the sentencing and corrections systems, as well as the criminal justice system as a whole, in California. During the 2007 phase of the Executive Sessions we held a series of theoretical and analytical discussions on four topics pertinent to state sentencing and corrections policy generally: the possibility of creating a sentencing commission for the state of California, the history of state-local partnerships in the field of sentencing and corrections, the role of the judiciary in developing sentencing policy, and data integration in the state-wide criminal justice system. For the 2008 phase of the Executive Sessions, we have narrowed our focus to center on ways in which information exchanges in criminal justice at the county level can inform public policy. Specifically, our mission in the 2008 Executive Sessions is to encourage collaborative criminal justice policy development by: promoting public/private partnerships with state, county, and municipal governments in the criminal justice arena; creating opportunities for the use of social science research to aid in the development and implementation of empirically-validated, data-driven criminal justice programs and policies; and serving as a public service consultant to the State of California and its fifty-eight counties.
The California Sentencing Commission: Laying the Groundwork. Report and Recommendations
California Corrections Reform: State/Local Partnerships. Findings and Analysis
The Role of the Judiciary in Shaping Sentencing Law and Policy. Report and Analysis
Criminal Justice Information Sharing: Enhancing Early Intervention, Measuring Results
Coordination at the Front-End of Sentencing: The Judiciary, Probation, and the Pre-Sentencing Report
County to County, Agency to Agency: Information Sharing and Operational Collaboration in the Bay Area and Southern California
The First 72 Hours of Re-Entry: Seizing the Moment of Release
Catch and Release: Using Risk-Needs Assessment to Manage Local Custodial Populations
The Stanford Criminal Justice Center is partnering with the Little Hoover Commission on its Sentencing Reform study, which represents a complete review of the opportunities for sentencing reform in California within the broader context of the State's correctional policies. As part of this study, the Commission will assess the role of sentencing reform as an element of overall correctional system reform including parole and prison reforms, and the importance of a "holistic" approach to reform policy. The Criminal Justice Center's Executive Director testified before the Commission at its public hearing on August 24, 2006. View a copy of the report submitted in preparation for that hearing. The Criminal Justice Center is currently preparing a report for the Commission on the history of amendments to California's sentencing system.
Dr. Joan Petersilia, a Visiting Professor of Law, taught a Stanford Law School class entitled, "Crime and Punishment Policy: Reforming California Corrections" during the fall semester 2005. This course offered students a unique opportunity to learn about California's historic attempt to reform its juvenile and adult corrections system. The students heard from many speakers, including the Director of Corrections, the Director of Juvenile Justice, ex-convicts, victims, families of prisoners, advocacy groups, and other researchers. Each student was required to choose a research topic for their term papers. Some of these student term papers, along with Dr. Petersilia course syllabus, have been placed on Stanford's Criminal Justice Center website in the hopes that they may be useful in the reform efforts.
California Sentencing & Corrections Policy Series Stanford Criminal Justice Center Working Paper.
Distributed for Review and Comment only. Do not cite without author's permission.
Please send questions or suggestions to Kara Dansky Executive Director, Stanford Criminal Justice Center.