Citation

Publication Date: 2001-01-01
Format: Working Paper
Bibliography: Joseph Bankman and Ian Ayres, Substitutes For Insider Trading, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No.214; Yale Law and Economics Research Paper No. 252 (April 2001). Document available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection.

More

When insider trading prohibitions limit the ability of insiders (or of a corporation itself) to use material non-public information to trade a particular firm's stock, there may be incentive to use the information to trade instead on the stock of that firm's rivals, suppliers, customers, or the manufacturers of complementary products. We refer to this form of trading as trading in stock substitutes. Stock substitute trading by a firm is legal. In many circumstance, substitute trading by employees is also legal. Trading in stock substitutes may be quite profitable, and there is anecdotal evidence that employees often engage in such trading. Our analysis suggests that substitute trading is less socially desirable than traditional insider trading. We recommend a set of disclosure rules designed to clarify existing law and provide information on the extent of stock substitute trading. We also discuss possible changes in the law that might limit inefficient trading in stock substitutes.

Other publications by this author

View All

• A Critical Look at A Critical Look--Reply to Sanchirico
  2011-07-10
• A Gas Tax Makes the Most Sense for California
  2009-08-11
• Federal Income Taxation, 15th ed.
  2009-07-01
• Introduction
  2009-06-01
• Cash Businesses and Tax Evasion
  2009-03-01
• Federal Income Tax: Examples and Explanations, 5th ed.
  2008-10-15
• Reply: Consumption Taxation is Still Superior to Income Taxation
  2007-12-01
• An Empirical Examination of Corporate Tax Noncompliance: Comments
  2007-11-01
• Consumption Taxation is Still Superior to Income Taxation
  2007-10-01
• State Tax Shelters and State Taxation of Capital
  2007-03-01