Citation

Publication Date: 2008-07-01
Format: Book Chapter
Bibliography: John Henry Merryman, The Good Faith Acquisition of Stolen Art, in Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative Context: Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjan Damaska, John Jackson, Maximo Langer and Peter Tillers, eds., Oxford: Hart Publishing, October 2008 / Stanford Public Law Working Paper, No. 1025515 (July 2008).

More

Good faith purchasers of stolen goods fare differently in Western legal systems. American rules favor the owner, while the civil law world protects the good faith purchaser. Oddly, this striking difference is misunderstood or denied or both by American scholars. American lawyer-economists who have considered which is the better rule differ in their perceptions and conclusions, as do the positions taken by non-economists. A related difference exists in the application of statutes of limitation in good faith purchaser cases. Proposals that it would be fairer to split the loss seem bound to fail. A solution involving the Art Loss Register and the New York courts' use of the laches doctrine is more promising.

Other publications by this author

View All

• The van Meegeren Problem
  2010-09-10
• Art Systems and Cultural Policy
  2010-08-01
• Comparative Law: Historical Development of the Civil Law Tradition in Europe, Latin America, and East Asia
  2010-07-20
• The American Art System and the New Cultural Policy
  2009-10-15
• A Tradição da Civil Law: Uma Introdução aos Sistemas Jurídicos de Europa e da América Latina
  2009-07-01
• Thinking About the Elgin Marbles: Critical Essays on Cultural Property, Art and Law, 2nd ed.
  2009-06-01
• The Nation and the Object
  2009-04-01
• Late Art Historian Deserves Mention for Helping Develop Rodin Collection
  2009-02-25
• Thinking About the Sevso Treasure
  2008-03-01
• Law, Ethics and the Visual Arts
  2007-01-01