Citation
Publication Date:
Format:
Bibliography:
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed the state's strong policy against noncompetition agreements, rejecting the Ninth Circuit's "narrow restraint" exception. We explain what the Court did, why California's policy makes sense, and what the opinion will mean for employers, for the high-tech industry, and for trade secret law.
Other publications by this author
- Distinguishing Lost Profits from Reasonable Royalties
- Brief of Amici Curiae The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc., The Andy Warhol Museum, Thomas Lawson, Barbara Kruger, Jonathan Monk, Allen Ruppersberg and Eleven Professors of Law in Support of Defendant-Appellee and Urging Affirmance
- An Antitrust Assessment of the Google Book Search Settlement
- Patent Trolls and the Effort to Fix the Patent System
- Intellectual Oligopoly: A Cautious Defense of Intellectual Oligopoly with Fringe Competition
- Fence Posts or Sign Posts: Rethinking Patent Claim Construction
- Copying in Patent Law
- Irrelevant Confusion
- Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? Evidence from the Most Litigated Patents
- Don't Tailor Make Patent Act
Author
- Mark A. Lemley
- Stanford Law School
- mlemley@law.stanford.edu
- 650 723.4605