Citation
Publication Date:
Format:
Bibliography:
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed the state's strong policy against noncompetition agreements, rejecting the Ninth Circuit's "narrow restraint" exception. We explain what the Court did, why California's policy makes sense, and what the opinion will mean for employers, for the high-tech industry, and for trade secret law.
Other publications by this author
- Tailoring Patents to Different Industries
- Don't Break the Internet
- Don't Break the Internet
- Patents, Smartphones, and the Public Interest
- Industry-Specific Antitrust Policy for Innovation
- Protect Innovators, Not Copyright Lawyers
- The Patent Crisis and How Courts Can Solve It
- Things You Should Care About in the New Patent Statute
- Life After Bilski
- Contracting Around Liability Rules
Author
- Mark A. Lemley
- Stanford Law School
- mlemley@law.stanford.edu
- 650 723.4605