Citation

Publication Date: 2009-05-15
Format: Magazine Article
Bibliography: Allen S. Weiner, The Torture Memos and Accountability, ASIL Insights, May 15, 2009.

More

Abstract

On April 16, the Justice Department released four previously classified memos issued by its Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) that provided legal guidance on the permissibility of certain aggressive techniques used during the interrogation of high-ranking al Qaeda suspects. The memos examined these techniques in light of the prohibition against torture under the Convention Against Torture (Torture Convention),[1] the U.S. criminal statute that implements the Torture Convention (“the anti-torture statute”),[2] and the prohibition on cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment under the Torture Convention. The release of the memos has provoked considerable discussion about possible criminal accountability for government officials who carried out interrogations or who formulated the legal guidance authorizing them. This Insight addresses questions regarding possible criminal liability for the responsible officials and some issues of state responsibility of the United States under international law.

Other publications by this author

View All

• Constitutions as Peace Treaties: A Cautionary Tale for the Arab Spring
  2011-11-18
• International Law. 6th edition
  2011-08-10
• More on Judge Richard Goldstone and His Reversal
  2011-04-07
• Working the System: A Comment on André Nollkaemper’s System Criminality in International Law
  2010-08-13
• Brief of Amici Curiae Experts in the Law of War
  2009-01-13
• Enhancing Implementation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1540
  2008-09-01
• International Law. 5th edition
  2007-07-01
• The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: What Lies Ahead?
  2007-04-01
• Law, Just War, and the International Fight Against Terrorism: Is it War?
  2007-01-01
• Hamdan, Terror, War
  2007-01-01