Citation

Publication Date: 2009-11-01
Format: Journal Article
Bibliography: Bhaven N. Sampat and Mark A. Lemley, Examining Patent Examination, Stanford Public Law Working Paper, No. 1485011 (November 2009) / 2010 Stanford Technology Law Review 2 (2010)

More

The USPTO receives more applications today than it ever has before. What happens to those applications? Patent prosecutors all have stories and personal experiences. Until quite recently, however, this sort of “anecdata” was all that was available, because the law prevented anyone from every finding out what happened to patent applications that did not ultimately issue as patents.

That changed in 2001, when the PTO began publishing data on pending applications, and when the PAIR system allowed the public to track the fate of those applications in real time. In this paper, we use those changes to report – for the first time ever – systematic data on the fate of applications in the PTO. We are able to confirm much received wisdom, but also to offer some surprising results.

Other publications by this author

View All

• Fixing the Patent Office
  2012-05-15
• Is Pepsi Really a Substitute for Coke? Market Definition in Antitrust and IP
  2012-04-10
• Contracting Around Liability Rules
  2012-04-01
• Patent Holdup, the ITC, and the Public Interest
  2012-03-15
• The Dubious Autonomy of Virtual Worlds
  2012-03-13
• Point of Novelty
  2012-03-09
• The Myth of the Sole Inventor
  2012-03-01
• Tailoring Patents to Different Industries
  2011-12-25
• Don't Break the Internet
  2011-12-21
• Don't Break the Internet
  2011-12-19