Citation
Publication Date:
Format:
Bibliography:
A soldier is killed in Iraq, serving his country; his grieving father arranges a funeral service and burial in the nearby cemetery of their hometown church; a publicity-seeking religious sect, dedicated to hateful religious and homophobic disparagement, as well as denigration of the U.S. government and its military efforts, pickets the funeral service. Due to this arresting set of factual circumstances, Snyder v. Phelps, an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim by the dead soldier’s father against the leader and members of the sect, was afforded considerable media attention—triggering widespread outrage in support of the victimized father. Despite the outpouring of sympathy, however, when the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, the Circuit Court of Appeals decision overturning a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff was affirmed, 8-1, on First Amendment grounds, Snyder v. Phelps, 131 S.Ct. 1207 (2011).
Snyder is, in fact, an easy case, in my view. When an individual or organized group engages in speech about a matter of public concern, the landmark case of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) has generated more than a half-century of precedent standing for the proposition that tort victims’ common law rights are substantially limited. The authority of Times—the power of its articulation of the values promoted by free and robust public discourse—has spilled beyond the borders of that Civil Rights-era defamation claim by southern officials against a widely-respected national newspaper to related tort areas of protection of personality: privacy (Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 (1967)) and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988)).
Other publications by this author
- The John G. Fleming Lecture: A Brief History of Accident Law – Tort and the Administrative State
- The Vaccine No-Fault Act: An Overview
- Tort Law and Alternatives: Cases and Materials, 9th ed.
- Harms from Exposure to Toxic Substances: The Limits of Liability Law
- The Pervasive Role of Uncertainty in Tort Law: Rights and Remedies
- Tort as a Litigation Lottery: A Misconceived Metaphor
- Emotional Distress in Tort Law: Themes of Constraint
- Territorial Claims in the Domain of Accident Law: Conflicting Conceptions of Tort Preemption
- Tobacco Control Strategies: Past Efficacy and Future Promise
- Dissembling and Disclosing: Physician Responsibility on the Frontiers of Tort Law
Author
- Robert L. Rabin
- Stanford Law School
- rrabin@stanford.edu
- 650 723.3073