Elsewhere Online twitter Facebook SLS Blogs YouTube SLS Channel Linked In SLSNavigator SLS on Flickr

SIGNAL: Stanford Interdisciplinary Group in Neuroscience and Law


May 26, 2011 5:15pm - 6:45pm

Room 271

    Does what the judge ate for breakfast really make a difference? A paper published recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences presents evidence of "extraneous" factors in judicial decision-making. The authors examined over 1000 parole decisions made by a set of Irsaeli judges, and report the striking result that favorable decisions drop from approximately 65% to nearly zero within a given session, as another food break approached. Come discuss the study and its potential implications for legal theory and practice, and eat and drink with us! All are welcome.

    Related Media