If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Join ‘Em? How Sitting by Designation Affects Judicial Behavior

Details

Author(s):
  • Shawn Miller
Publish Date:
June 12, 2014
Publication Title:
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2449349, June 12, 2014.
Format:
Working Paper
Citation(s):
  • Mark A. Lemley and Shawn Miller, If You Can't Beat 'Em, Join 'Em? How Sitting by Designation Affects Judicial Behavior, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2449349, June 12, 2014.
Related Organization(s):

Abstract

Judges, lawyers, and scholars have long decried the high reversal rate district judges face in patent cases. Many have suggested greater district court specialization as a solution, and Congress in 2011 enacted legislation to promote such specialization. In this paper, we investigate the impact of a novel measure of experience – whether a district court judge has sat by designation on a Federal Circuit panel in a patent claim construction appeal – on the likelihood a district judge’s subsequent claim constructions are reversed. Before sitting by designation, judges who later do so actually have a slightly higher claim construction reversal rate than judges who never do so. After sitting by designation, the reversal rate of district court judges on subsequent claim construction appeals decreases by 50 percent. This decrease is not fully explained by other measures of experience, including the number of prior patent cases or years on the bench. Nor is it fully explained by the timing of the appeal, the particular district court judge or various other characteristics of the patents, the parties and the litigation. Our results suggest a simple way to reduce the reversal rate in patent and perhaps other sorts of cases. However, our evidence suggests this increased agreement is due to increased Federal Circuit trust in the decisions of individual judges who have sat by designation and not increased district judge understanding of claim construction.